Annual Best Book Ratings: Objective or Not?

In my opinion, a book should only be rated decades after it was published, when thousands of readers have lived through it and agreed: “this book has changed us”. Today, I would rather rate the books published in the 1990-es, that would be more objective.
Anyway, thanks to Publishers Weekly for the job of putting together and highlighting some information on the most recent publications for us. With all the mass of books being published every year, it is becoming almost impossible to pick out really good books without the help of such ratings.

http://best-books.publishersweekly.com/pw/best-books/2016/top-10#book/book-1 OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SavvyAuthors

SavvyAuthors: Writers helping writers.

Red Sofa Literary

Sometimes the best ideas are associated with a red couch. . .

Rule Number 32

Enjoy the little things. ~Zombieland

Unsolicited Feedback

Harry Katz's Blog

%d bloggers like this: